French Wine Makers and the Launching of American Viticulture Sal Westrich Abstract While one cannot speak of sustained French immigration to the American colonies, some notable examples can be cited. The Labadists were mystics who lived communally on their 4,000 acre Maryland farm. There were the French settlers of Gallipolis in Ohio who, it appears,…
The 1860–1970 period is a particularly interesting period to study wine trade because of dramatic changes in the wine markets and trade over the course of a century. The dramatic changes in trade flows were caused by both “nature” and “men”. Mediterranean wine trade represented around 90% of global wine trade and France was the world’s leading exporter. The arrival of Phylloxera devastated French vineyards and stimulated Spanish and Italian wine exports. When French wine production recovered, French winegrowers pressured their government to intervene, resulting in high tariffs on Spanish and Italian wines and Greek raisins. The protectionist trade regime contributed to the bankruptcy of Greece and to the substitution of wine trade from Spain and Italy to France’s North African colonies. When Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia became independent, France imposed high wine tariffs, effectively killing their wine exports. The decline of the wine industry in North Africa coincided with the trade and policy integration of the South European wine exporters in the EEC—the predecessor of the EU.
This study examines features of regional clusters and environmental sustainability among member firms. By studying a sample of 646 firms across four regional wine clusters in Australia, the evidence suggests regiona l export intens it y is positive ly associat ed wit h implementation rates of environmentally sustainable practices. Further, as women in leadership roles (as a proxy for social proximity) grow within regional clusters, this strengthens the relationship between export intensity and environmental sustainability. The results advance research on the features of regional clusters that are expected to influence the adoption of organiza tio na l practices among member firms. Conclusio ns are presented along with limitations and future research opportunities.
Everything you know about wine is right — for now. But by mid-century, it will be wrong, and here’s why. Climate change, shifting global demand, consumer preferences, new vinification techniques, and marketing will transform the industry and upend conventional wisdom. This transformation has profound implications for the environmental footprint of the industry and conservation, both in traditional wine regions and in emerging wine-producing areas.
Things that would ring true to a well-informed wine consumer right now might include: Most wine is produced in Mediterranean climates;
European wine regions are a successful marketing tool;
China isn’t a big consumer of European-style wine;
Extensive chemical manipulation during vinification is not common in fine wines.
By 2050, each of these statements will be wrong, and the stakes couldn’t be higher – for wine, for the environment, and for the environmental footprint of wine production. Let’s look at each of these themes in turn.
The objective of the paper is to investigate how the market structure of grape varieties affects the performance in the wine industry. We examine the export performance of countries in 2000 and 2010 and analyze the market structure hypothesis applied to grape varieties and the technical efficiency of the market structure of grapes on exports performance using a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology. Our results are based on a sample of 20 major wine exporting countries. First, only a few countries are efficient. Second, a small number of prime varieties is not a condition to obtain efficiency. Finally, concentration of top varieties is not sufficient to be efficient.
This paper identifies the macroeconomic determinants of fine wine prices and estimates their impacts on a monthly database from 1996 to 2015. The fine wine demand from emerging markets plays a key role in fine wine pricing, and more precisely, on the fluctuation of Bordeaux fine wine prices. Furthermore, the continuous weakening of the U.S. Dollar in real term favors the fine wine prices to increase. Since 2011, the slowdown of economic growth in emerging markets, followed by the depreciation of national currencies has engendered negative effects on the fine wine market. Along with the process of financialization in the fine wine market, fine wine prices have become more volatile. Factors such as money supply, real interest rate and the growth of investment funds start to show their influence on fine wine pricing.
This study investigates the impact of working capital management (WCM) on firm profitability in the French wine industry. Based on annual data of 430 wine-producing firms from 2003 to 2014, we estimated the impact of the cash conversion cycle (CCC) and its components (days inventory, receivable and payable) on the return on assets. Other firm factors, such as size, growth, tangibility and leverage, were used for control. We took into account nonlinearity, unobservable heterogeneity, heteroscedasticity and endogeneity through the two-step GMM estimation method and showed that WCM did not have a significant impact on the profitability of French wine firms. Furthermore, we found no optimal level of CCC that would allow the firms to maximize their profitability. Only days account receivable and payable significantly and negatively impacted profitability. These results differ from those of previous studies and suggest that French wine firms should shorten the time both to collect cash from sales and pay providers. Contrarily to what we believe, the delay in converting inventories to cash does not significantly impact profitability. The managerial implications of these results were further explored by interviewing three wine firms in the south of France.
Product differentiation, competitive advantage and increased sales could be achieved by wineries through the adoption of environmentally focused practices (Nowak and Washburn, 2002). However, a competitive advantage can only be gained in the marketplace if firms are able to communicate to consumers’ about their environmental focus (Bisson et al., 2002). Environmentally sustainable products are credence goods; consumers cannot ascertain their environmental qualities during purchase or use (Crespi and Marett, 2005). Consumers are not present during the production process of the product and therefore cannot assess environmental friendliness of production. Therefore, extrinsic cues such as packaging has an important function of eco-labeling, being used to reduce information asymmetry between the producer of sustainable products and consumers by providing credible information related to the environmental credentials of the product (Leire and Thidell, 2005). Eco-label logos and claims are the most used extrinsic attributes to signal the environmental attributes of wines to consumers. While organic and biodynamic are the most successful eco-claim at this stage, it is by no means the only sustainable claim. Environmental responsible, made with sustainable practices, 100% eco-friendly, carbon neutral, greener planet are other environmental sustainable claims that can be found on wine bottle labels (Zucca et al., 2009). Because the eco- label/claims are the first line of communication to entice the consumer, it seems therefore extremely important that other extrinsic packaging attributes can also meet the “information” that environmental friendly claims try to convey.
An important attribute of wine packaging is type of closure that by its sealing properties can directly influence the intrinsic attributes of wines. Moreover, closures are also an important extrinsic packaging attribute. Various types of closures such as cork stoppers, screw caps and synthetic closures can be considered by consumers to be a direct reflection of the wine quality and in some extent influence their purchase decision. (Chaney, 2000; Reidick, 2003; Toubia et al., 2005; Barber and Almanza, 2006; Barber et al., 2008; Marin et al., 2007a; Barber et al., 2009b). Although ample research has been conducted on the importance of wine bottle closures in quality perception and purchase decisions of consumers in different countries, however, little is known about how type of closure affects consumer expectations, price and willingness to purchase eco-labeled wines.
The purpose of this paper was to investigate perceptions and current experiences with kegged wine (also known as wine-on-tap). Winery owners, winemakers, and other winery employees from various U.S. wine growing regions responded to an online survey.
Some wineries produce kegged wine on their own, while others use third-party kegging facilities. Eco-friendliness and wine quality preservation were considered important, yet not identified as primary motivators. Increasing sales volume and competitive advantages, on the other hand, were driving the adoption of kegged wine.
On average, the estimated sales price for a keg (5.16 Gallons) of white wine was US$ 174 and for a red wine keg US$225. Kegged wine accounted for almost 9% of the wineries’ annual production volume. Most wineries used the same brand for their kegged wine as for their bottled wine.
The findings of this study provide initial insights into experiences, reasons, and perceptions related to the adoption of a recent wine packaging innovation: kegged wine. The sample was mostly comprised of California wineries, a market where distances between wineries and third party kegging specialists are relatively short; therefore, the generalization of the results may be restricted.
China is one of the most attractive wine markets and a hopeful wine producer in the 21st century. Current studies of wine in China tend to focus on the wine market but seldom analyze the domestic wine industry which contributes approximately 80% of the total wine consumed in the country while Westerners know little of it. This paper analyzes the current situation and the perspectives of the wine industry in China considering both traditional conditions such as wine history, wine policies as well as recent conditions such as e- commerce, climate change and domestic economy trend. We conduct a “SWOT” of the Chinese wine industry considering four sectors (producing, processing, selling and consuming) and use a SWOT Matrix analysis. Then we provide strategies for the development of the Chinese industry from governmental level, industrial level and enterprises level.